Micromanager boss insists reliable employee finish urgent project by ‘strictly adher[ing]’ to company manual, so the employee takes his sweet time and purposefully flops on deadline

Advertisement
  • 01
    "Sometimes, the best way to fix a broken system is to show exactly how broken it is.”
  • 02
    Want it done by the book? Fine, I'II follow every rule.
  • 03
    So, I work at a company that prides itself on having a detailed, overly complicated policy manual for everything. We've got rules for rules, basically. My manager, let's call him Dave, is the
  • 04
    kind of guy who loves micromanaging. He'd constantly hover over our shoulders, pointing out every tiny mistake we made, saying, "If it's in the manual, you must follow it."
  • 05
    One day, Dave sent me an urgent email asking me to finish a big project before the end of the day. Normally, I'd do it my usual way-efficiently and with a bit of common sense. But Dave insisted
  • 06
    that I "strictly adhere to the manual" since it was a "high-visibility project" and he didn't want "any mistakes." Oh, Dave. You shouldn't have said that.
  • 07
    I pulled out the manual and went full compliance mode. 1. Every procedure, no matter how small, was followed to the letter. Normally, I'd skip pointless steps, like writing a detailed log for
  • 08
    every 10-minute task. Not this time. I logged everything. Starting a document? Log it. Saving the file? Log it again. Changing font size? Yep, logged. 2. Requests for
  • 09
    approvals? Oh, absolutely. The manual says certain steps need "managerial sign-off," so I emailed Dave at least five times throughout the day for approvals. "Hey, Dave, just confirming font size
  • 10
    12 is acceptable? Please reply so I can continue." "Hi, Dave, should I use blue headers or red headers as per policy section 14.3.2?" 3. Breaks were strictly enforced. Policy states we get two
  • 11
    15-minute breaks and a 1-hour lunch. Normally, I'd work through a bit of lunch to get things done, but not today. At 12:00 sharp, I dropped everything and left my desk. I also spent 15
  • 12
    minutes at exactly 10:00 and 3:00 "resting." 4. Every department had to be involved. The manual said I needed sign-offs. from IT, HR, and marketing for certain sections, even though
  • 13
    they had nothing to do with the project. I looped them in with formal requests, dragging out the timeline. By the end of the day, the project wasn't finished. I
  • 14
    spent so much time "complying" with the manual that I didn't even get halfway through. Dave was furious and asked why it wasn't done. I calmly explained that I followed every single
  • 15
    policy and procedure in the manual, just like he instructed. I even showed him the email chain proving he'd approved my steps. After that, Dave stopped breathing down my neck
  • 16
    and started letting me work how I wanted. Lesson learned: Sometimes, the best way to fix a broken system is to show exactly how broken it is.
  • 17
    Snozzberry... 1d ago • • THIS is what comes to mind when I hear "malicious compliance." Following every rule to the T, showing management how back a wards they are
  • 18
    Karma1913 1d ago • "Working to rule" is a time honored and wonderful way to tell a boss to pound sand.
  • 19
    Technical-P... • 1d ago. Good for you! One thing though, take your breaks every day. It's your personal time. Don't work unpaid for those su ers.
  • 20
    Cheezburger Image 10433345280

Tags

Scroll Down For The Next Article